People need to use their heads in order to find it, not their shovels.
The
biggest secrets in the world are best hidden when they are in plain
view. In order to understand exactly what the case with Alexander’s tomb
is, we have to think in the exactly opposite way than the one the
system would like us to think. This means that we have to think in the
exactly opposite way than we did so far, which did not allow us to
really see what most likely is in front of us all the time. We can
literally see the tomb in our mind if we close our eyes.
Besides,
it is known that people can see things better if they use their mind
instead of their eyes. Perfectly sighted eyes can be fooled by an
illusion, whereas a great mind cannot.
Perfectly
sighted eyes can see an illusionist actually cut a man in three pieces,
whereas the mind sees a trick. Perfectly sighted eyes may see palm
trees and oases in a desert, whereas a good mind sees them only when
they are actually there.
What
does this mean in our case? It means that the location of Alexander’s
tomb is not actually a secret. Not only has it not been lost, but we
have all seen it without actually realizing what it is that we are
looking at. The Establishment plays tricks on us, like conjurers do, and
has convinced us that the tomb is lost because there is no sign to
indicate it, whereas we can see it in front of us and touch it if we use
our mind. This is the reason we refer to the mind and not the eyes. We
speak of thoughts, not research. We can easily see where the tomb is if
we consider that Alexander has a recent, therefore living relationship
with the Establishment that we did not know of.
So,
we should not think like archaeologists who seek after a lost symbol of
a former Establishment. In Alexander’s case there is no lost symbol
because there is no former Establishment. There is the eternal symbol of
the eternal – therefore of the current as well – Establishment, so we
have to think as citizens who seek to find what the Establishment’s
interests pertaining to such a symbol are. This is of immense importance
and the reader will understand why as he keeps on reading.
First
of all, it is necessary to mention that it is practically impossible
for a tomb like this to vanish from the face of the earth. The lot of
the civilized world of that era worshiped Alexander like a God-Man for
many centuries. He was not just another ordinary man, so time could not
possibly cover the tomb with oblivion. Emperors searched for the tomb of
this God-Man in order to pay their respects, so it was impossible for
it to be left in oblivion, covered with sand and dust. A tomb, which is
the resting place of the most important historical figure of a recorded
era in the human history, cannot be considered lost. Just like Napoleon
Bonaparte’s tomb cannot get lost in our era, Alexander’s tomb could not
have gotten lost in his era. The science of history had already been
grounded and there is evidence which describes the facts of that era
just as they have transpired.
There
is a financial aspect as well. Superstition thrived during the period
when Alexander’s remains were lost. In the present case, the verb
thrived is interpreted in terms of money. It denotes gold. There were
people who had turned faith into business and sold sacred heads and
relics of any random and unknown saint; therefore we can understand that
if someone sold as much as what once was Alexander’s finger, he could
become fabulously rich.
That
is, if Alexander’s tomb was left to chance in those times, some people
would have become rich after they had shared its content. The tomb of
such a great man cannot be left to dilapidate, decay and be crashed by
dust and rocks. Why? It is because it is not given the necessary time.
It is not just a tomb but also the chance of a lifetime for many people
to become rich. Legions of soldiers must have protected it during that
crucial period so that they could prevent would-be grave-robbers from
gaining riches. God knows how many rapacious hands of would-be
desecrators must have been cut while trying to steal the tomb which was
worth a treasure.
So,
during an era when fingers, kidneys and lungs of saints were supposed
to work wonders and everybody was told lies and wild exaggerations,
nobody could claim that he possesses and exhibits a part of Alexander’s
relic, namely the most famous, handsome, beloved thus potentially most
profitable relic on the planet. In fact, it was the most well-preserved
relic, considering the fact that Alexander’s remains had been mummified
by the best experts of that era. If anything, it is a spectacular sight,
to say the least. It is not a bunch of bones which have been dug up
from the mud. How can such a treasure be lost?
Among
other things, this can only mean one very simple thing. Whoever has
Alexander’s relic took the whole of it and can afford not to display it
for money. Besides, the way the whole situation evolved leads us to
conclude that this person had enough power to threaten even with death
any person dared set a business around Alexander’s relic; any
sacrilegious trickster would dare appear having parts of Alexander’s
relic. The Establishment itself is the only one with the foregoing
specifications. One could claim to possess about forty toes of saints
but he could not so much as dare claim that he possesses even a small
toe-nail of Alexander. He could have naïve believers worshiping a
forty-foot saint, but he would face death if he had them worshiping
Alexander’s toe-nails.
Therefore,
the reader understands that he should not think from the objective of
an archaeologist because there is nothing buried that needs to be
excavated. The tomb exists, there are people who know where it is and
they definitely do not wait for archaeologists to discover it. This goes
beyond the scope of archaeology and enters the scope of politics. This
tomb may have never been covered by dust and rocks but it has
undoubtedly been covered by interests so as to remain unseen. Here lies
the sensitive point. If someone realizes this, he can figure out the
location of Alexander’s tomb. Actually, Alexander’s tomb is the most openly hidden tomb in the world. Actually, it is located in the centre of our world as we know it.
The
main question raised at this point is why, for example, the existence
of a tomb of a person with such great prestige would be undesirable; why
the Establishment does not want the location of Alexander’s tomb to be
known, so he hides it. We will compare this situation with a kindred one
so that the answer can be perfectly clear to the reader. It is the same
as with the Romanov family tomb. The Soviet regime did not – on a much
smaller scale – wish for a Romanov tomb to exist, for the same reason
that the Russian Communism did not wish for the tomb of the former
leader of the Russian capitalism to exist. What was the reason? It was
that his tomb alone would become a centre of attraction for the
followers of an opposite regime or of a hostile ideology which would be
unwelcome to the Establishment.
Things
are simple. Nobody keeps a spark alive if he knows it can set out an
unanticipated fire that will burn him. If the tomb of Tsar Nicholas
were known, it would become a centre of attraction for the
co-ideologists. Nostalgists of the Tsarist regime would gather around
this tomb and celebrate Days unwelcome to the Soviet regime.
Reactionaries would turn the tomb into a meeting point where they would
get together with their co-ideologists fast and effectively.
Anticommunists would use the tomb to denounce the Soviet regime’s
brutality and fanatics would march past it.
How
can anyone believe that the Soviet regime did not know where the
Romanov bones are buried? Is it possible that somewhere along the way
the communist Moscow disremembered where it has stuffed these bones? Of
course it did not. The perennial interests of the Soviet Moscow had led
the latter to continuously withhold information regarding these bones
that would put it in danger. How can, therefore, the discovery of these
bones – thus of the Romanov tomb – be a job for the archaeologists? Was
there even a single Soviet or any other foreigner who believed that the
discovery of the bones was a job for the archaeologists? Of course there
was not. Everybody knew that the finding of the tomb was a job for the
government of Moscow. If the government wished to reveal it, it would;
if it did not wish to reveal it, there was no way in hell the Russians
would ever find out. Even if every Russian grabbed a shovel and dug,
they could not find the bones. Why is that? It is because if their
search brought them close to them, Moscow would hide them elsewhere in
order to keep them away from the public eye.
Alexander’s
tomb is a similar situation, the only difference being that it has some
important particularities. Ordinary people do not know where Alexander
is buried, but the Establishment does. There is no way it does not know.
Ordinary people are not like the Establishment and we do not know what
goes on, so we make a huge mistake. We apply to the wrong people for the
finding of Alexander’s tomb. Alexander was a historical figure, so we
get confused and apply to the wrong scientific field. Finding
Alexander’s tomb is not a job for the archaeology which will discover
what was once lost. Its finding is a job for the political scientists
because the Establishment itself has hidden it.
So,
what is the point at issue here? First, we will compare and contrast
the mystery pertaining to Alexander’s and Tsar’s tombs. The similarities
will help us conclude if Alexander’s tomb is hidden and the differences
will help us conclude where it is hidden. The first thing we need to do
is examine why Alexander’s tomb causes a problem to the Establishment
of the Western world similar to the one the Romanov tomb causes to the
Soviet regime. We need to examine the reason why the Establishment’s
interests are threatened by this tomb. We need to examine and understand
why the Establishment is threatened and hides the tomb when it could
make a fortune out of it.
There
is no other sight more celebrated and more lucrative than Alexander’s
tomb. Such a sight can yield tons of money to infinity. Alexander has
been worshiped by the biggest religions. The Greeks consider him a
God-Man but he has been canonized by Christianity and ranks among the
Prophets of Islam. No other person has even been honored like this. So,
why would the Establishment have reasons to hide him since it itself
acknowledges that he has these qualities? What is more, – and here lies
the big difference – we need to examine the Establishment’s true
feelings towards this famous dead man. This way we will be able to
figure out the whereabouts of the tomb that the respective Establishment
has hidden in relation to the position of its own center.
We
will begin with the issue of interests. If someone manages to prove
that there is a connection between world rulers’ interests and
Alexander’s bones, he will find the exact position of the bones with the
precision of a GPS. In order for the reader to better understand what
has really happened with Alexander’s tomb, we will examine things from
an unknown perspective; a perspective that has remained unknown until
today; the perspective that reveals connections we do not even suspect
of existing. What is the connection between Alexander and the former and
current world rulers who have the power to hide the existence of the
tomb? Only people with such power would be able to hide this tomb. It is
not enough for someone to want to hide a tomb of a man like Alexander;
he also needs to have the power to actually carry it into effect.
That
is to say, it would have been an unsuccessful attempt even if some
insignificant fanatic Christian priests or Taliban muftis wished to hide
the tomb so that the religious fold or the Islamic people would not be
tempted to think in the Greek, therefore sinful, way. Hiding the dead
body of a God-Man who has millions of followers ready to kill so as to
defend their God calls for great power. At the same time – and here lies
the antinomy of the whole situation – having such great power at that
given time called for someone to be that God-Man’s follower and priest.
This
means that the people who have hidden Alexander’s tomb were powerful
and given the facts we understand that they were people who worshiped
Alexander at the time when they attempted to hide his tomb. Why are we
so certain of this? It is because the tomb was lost during the era of
the Greek nation’s omnipotence; during the years of the Hellenistic
Rome. It was an era when – as we will discover later on – the emperors
felt a special bond with Alexander.
It
is not as if Rome had collapsed so that its God’s tomb and other
treasures were covered with dust and mud. It is not as if Rome had been
conquered by people of a different creed so that its sanctities were
burned or destroyed by the wrath and vindictiveness of the barbarians.
Alexander’s tomb was hidden from plain view by some all-mighty notables
of the empire. We seek for the political interests that led to the
secretion of the tomb, not the religious feelings of the Roman emperors
which were already known.
In
order to understand what their religious feelings were we will follow a
very special but useful line of thought. Everybody knows the term
blue-blooded, still, few people can interpret it. Everybody is aware of
the term but nobody actually knows its meaning. Everything is in the
open and well hidden at the same time, just like Alexander’s tomb. What
could such a word denote? What is its usefulness? One thing is dead
certain, that some people manage to keep their special relations alive
along the centuries through this mystic fact. They manage to keep the
secrets according to which they have a blue blood, thus they are
superior. Why are they considered to have a blue blood, though? Does
anyone know the origin of the term? Why aren’t they called green-blooded
or red-cheeked?
The
children of Rome are therefore superior for the simple reason that they
are the children of a living God. They are the children of the man who
connects the Divine with the human. They are the children of the Roman
emperor. In what way is the emperor connected with the Divine, though?
The Roman emperor of the
day was considered to be a living God. He was given this attribute as he
was the direct descendant of the thirteenth Dod of Rome, namely
Dionysus. Alexander, though – according to the Roman religion – was Dionysus incarnate during his Triumph.
Alexander became the thirteenth Roman God after he had been belauded.
Where and how did Alexander prove that he was the Son of God? He
proved it in Siva’s alter and the priests of the Ammon Zeus acknowledged
it. The big secret of Rome lies In Egypt, Africa. Ammon Zeus was said
to have a blue blood according to the Ultimate Knowledge of the adepts.
He was the only one among the Gods to have such blood. Alexander had the
same blood because he was his son, therefore the Roman emperor had the
same blood and therefore the children of Rome had the same blood.
Did
the reader understand where we are getting at? The fate of Alexander’s
tomb depended on the interests of the all-powerful people who considered
themselves to be his descendants. These descendants loved him so they
would never forsake him and destroy his remains. On the contrary, they
had interests to hide them from the eyes of the commoners. This is why
it is so important for people to know where the term blue-blooded
originates from. We should
look no further than those interests in order to find the reasons for
the tomb’s disappearance. Why? It is because, among other things, there
is a paradox related to Alexander’s tomb.
During
the years of the Hellenistic omnipotence, everybody wanted to get hold
of Alexander’s tomb so that they could increase their powers. Whoever
claimed world domination claimed Alexander’s remains as well, even by
force. Possession of Alexander’s remains was the standard qualification –
something like a university degree – for every would-be world
dominator. Alexander’s remains have been claimed by Babylon, Pella,
Alexandria and all his would-be successors. Egypt was the first to play
dirty, followed by Rome. Ptolemaeus was the first to steal the holy body
of Alexander on his way to Macedonia so as to have it in his kingdom,
thus have the leverage to claim not only the legitimacy but also the
primacy of world domination. Rome waited for its turn to come. It did
whatever it could whenever it could to ensure it was the next in line.
Rome
had always wanted to get hold of the relic of the son of Ammon. It was
as strong a desire as the others’ who aspired to succeed him. It was a
strong desire for anyone who dared to claim it, even by illicit means,
like Ptolemaeus did. It is just that Rome paid its respects to it, as
required, for as long as there was nothing else it could do, and caught
hold of it when it had the power to do so. Let’s think of a simple
thing. We follow the course of this tomb along the centuries through
Rome’s actions. Caesar,
who has been the “first” Roman emperor, has paid his respects to the
tomb. Traianus, who was the “greatest” emperor of Rome, has paid his
respects to the tomb. Caligula, who was an insane emperor of Rome, has
paid his respects to the tomb.
Caligula,
for example, stole Alexander’s armor so as to gain some of his
strength. Why did he steal the armor? He did it for the simple reason
that he could not steal the rest of the remains. This was the only thing
he was able to do. Rome’s power was that much during that era, so was
its share to the Alexander’s remains. All of the sudden, this glorious
treatment of Alexander stopped, as if by magic. Since 300 A.D. and after
Caracallas had been emperor, there is no other record as to the
whereabouts of Alexander’s tomb. What had happened that changed things
in such an impressive way? Coincidentally, it was the same time when
Christianity started rising.
During
the Christian years that followed, no empiric notable wanted people to
know where Alexander’s tomb is because his rights to exert power, which
derived from the Establishment, which was now a Christian one, would be
threatened. Up until then, Rome worshiped Alexander but pretended not to
know anything about the location of his tomb, for obvious reasons. The
Christian Rome pretended not to know where the tomb of the man who had
been its Holy Grain was. What happened to change Rome’s attitude?
Something happened that is a common practice for the Establishment. The
members of the Establishment did not change, but their interests did.
The members did not change, but their guise did. They appeared under the
Christian guise and had to hide in chests their former Hellenistic
ones.
What
does this mean in effect? It means that Rome, after it had made the
choice to become Christian, had to change its attitude. It had to
protect its interests and among the first things necessary to be done
was to cover the tomb of its Father with oblivion. It was a selective
oblivion that made Alexander invisible to humans. Being Christian now,
it was no longer in Rome’s interest for Alexander’s tomb to be
disclosed. Rome had no reason to turn its Father’s tomb into a center of reaction against its
own authority. What is more, being the head of Christianity gave Rome
the alibi to steal the tomb from those who had it until then, since it
could reassure them that it would use it to enhance its authority. Rome
could get hold of the remains of the beloved Alexander and no one would
react to this claim.
Its
actions were certainly a choice based on interests because Rome did not
just fall into the hands of conquerors who plundered and destroyed its
previous guise. Rome alone, which believed in the Dodecatheon, had
decided – during the time of its omnipotence – to become Christian. The
same Rome which treated Alexander as its thirteenth god and worshiped
him decided to adopt a religion which was threatened by the beloved God
of the Roman dominators. Why was it threatened? It was because Alexander
was an enemy then on. He was the most powerful enemy of the Christian
Rome. He was not an enemy of the Romans as individuals but an enemy of
the Roman interests; the new Roman interests. He was an enemy of the New
Religion, thus an enemy of the New Roman Order of Things.
They
took that enemy as well as other elements of the former Order of Things
inimical to them and put them in their own luxurious chest of history.
Apart from these practical issues pertaining to the simple interests of
Rome, things did not change dramatically. The new interests of the same
people could not efface old loves and worships. The new interests of the
Romans could not change their worship for their beloved Father; their
worship for a Father who was blue-blooded, which meant that they were
blue-blooded as well. Alexander would simply have to become the secret
God of Rome. He would be a God only to the chosen ones. Only they could
and had the right to know about Alexander. Only they could and would
open the chest and enjoy their valuable heirlooms and amulets.
There
is nothing strange about this. Christianity has always been a
multi-speed religion. The illiterates would identify with Peter the
Apostle because he also was an illiterate, the educated ones would
identify with Paul the Apostle because he also was educated, and the
blue-blooded superiors would identify with other Apostles. The rule was
simple. The Jews would guide the poor and the illiterate, and the Greeks
would guide the chosen ones. Does anybody believe that the all-powerful
members of the Christian Establishment worshiped all the colorful and
half-mad crocks that Christianity canonized from time to time? Does
anybody believe that they worshiped the Saint Nobody the Anchorite and
the Blessed Weeping Nought? The Vatican runs a whole operation of
sanctification. Even today there are people waiting for their turn to be
canonized. There are saints who are considered a joke by the
blue-blooded people, yet they are useful to them for keeping the poor
under their control.
Does
anybody know what the stance of all-powerful secret fraternal orders,
like the Masons, towards the Divine is? Have they ever been punished for
being sectarians? Have they ever been captured and burned by the
Spanish Inquisition? Have their huge fortunes ever been confiscated? Of
course they have not. Why not? It is because all these behaviors were
initiated by Rome and stayed within Rome. Even the Popes themselves
belong to such secret fraternal orders. Popes themselves do not believe
to what they suggest others do. They suggest anything that interests
Christianity and Rome, not what they themselves believe. It is evident
that Christianity addressed the mob within the empire. It was the best
way for the blue-blooded Romans to serve their interests.
They
had decided that the mob did not need to know or understand anything
more about its beloved God, Alexander. They dealt with the situation the
same way they had dealt with other aspects of the Greek religion and
worship. Greek children are educated at school and they are taught that
the secrets of the Hellenic Mysteries have been irretrievably lost.
Nobody will ever know exactly what took place during the Eleusinian
Mysteries or the Kavirian Mysteries. How can this even be possible? How
can this undyingly classified and extra-valuable knowledge be lost?
Wasn’t the Roman emperor an archpriest of the Greek religion, namely the
perfect adept of the Hellenic Mysteries? Wasn’t it a Roman emperor,
thus an archpriest of the Dodecatheon, who decided to make Rome
Christian? So, what happened all of the sudden? Did he forget everything
he knew? Did he start hating all these things he had worshiped until
then?
How
can the knowledge of such a mechanism which was under the authority of
the emperor be lost? Did the latter himself destroy the vessels of
knowledge which up until then helped him maintain his authority and made
him out to be the chosen of Gods? Why did he do it? Did he do it out of
humility? Did he do it so that he would become one with the illiterate
and benighted plebe which he did not even take into account? What was
the purpose of destroying all these useful and beneficial to him
evidence when he could just hide it? What was the purpose of destroying
it instead of just hiding it in a basement in Rome? It is not as if he
would be saddled with it. What was the purpose of destroying it? Did he
do it because he was a fanatic? He might have been a self-seeker but he
was no Christian fanatic. Was there any chance that the rest of the
all-powerful archpriests would allow him to destroy this huge
intellectual wealth? Therefore, he must have hidden it in collaboration
with the supreme priestly notables of the empire. Besides, this is the
reason why some wings in the Vatican Library are inaccessible to the
commoners.
We
understand, therefore, that the most logical thing to assume is that
nothing has been lost. Everything has been hidden and nothing has been
lost. The Greek knowledge has been hidden just like the tomb of the
Superior Greek Man has been hidden. Books like The Name of the Rose do not only reveal some of the Greek knowledge but also knowledge related to Alexander’s tomb. It
was the tomb that Rome had always had under its control. Even if
Alexander’s tomb had been in the New Rome, or else Constantinople, for a
number of centuries, it returned to Rome after the Crusades. Whether it
was out of fear that the valuable relic of Alexander would fall into
the hands of the barbarian Seltzuk Turks, who might not have known how
to handle the most delicate matter of the empire, or because they wanted
to signify the renewal of Rome’s world domination, the relic of
Alexander was re-transferred to Rome where it rests until today.
Why
are we so sure of it? It is because it cannot rest anywhere else.
Because the powerful people of this world could not have agreed on a
different location. The Germans could not have agreed for the symbol of
the Romeo-Catholic Empire to be in the hands of the British or the
French, and the same goes for all possible locations. Their Father had
to remain in his House so that his blue-blooded children would not fight
with each other. Mother Rome would have her dead in its bosom and the
children would have their dead. Rome would have Alexander, the Germans
would have Carlomagno, the French would have Napoleon and the British
would have Henry the IIX. The children of Rome wanted to succeed their
father and continue his game to their own benefit. Rome protects the
rules of this game and this is the reason it has power over life and
death over anyone who threatens it, no matter who that person is.
We
need to remember at this point what we referred to at the beginning of
the text regarding the new information that results from finding the
differences and similarities between Alexander and Romanov’s case. As we
have aforementioned, the Establishment in both cases had no choice but
to keep the location of the respective tomb a secret because it served
its interests. The whereabouts of the tomb, though, in each case depends
on the different feelings of each Establishment toward the tomb. There
is a big difference that leads us to reach to more conclusions.
The
communist Soviets were not only adversely affected by the Romanov tomb
but they also hated it. This is the reason why they not only kept the
tomb a secret but in effect they disgraced the Tsar by burying him deep
in the ground of central Russia. On top of everything else, they
punished him by depriving him of the right to a proper grave where
people could pay their respects. The blue-blooded Romans were also
adversely affected by a disclosed location of Alexander’s tomb but –
contrary to the Soviets – not only did they not hate it but they
worshiped it. It’s true they wanted to secure their interests that were
threatened by Alexander’s tomb but they had no desire whatsoever to
punish him. This is why they turned to a midway solution which would
satisfy everybody and would be known only to them. Since they had the
power and the authority they would make sure Alexander’s tomb rested
close to them. It would be powerless to harm them, yet permanently close
to them.
They
would give due honor to it by stealth and they would publicly claim
that they did not know anything about its location. This was their way
to perform their duty towards the Superior Man in full, yet they knew
they had deprived him of his contact with those who he loved, namely the
ordinary people. In reality, they kidnapped Alexander and turned him
into a true age-long deceased Homer; into an immortal Odysseus-like
hero, secluded in some secret and out of reach Ogygia-kind of place.
What is more, they could control this way the extent to which noisy
people or investigators would have access to him. This is the reason why
right from the start we insist on claiming that it was the Roman
interests which had changed pertaining to Alexander, not their feelings
towards him. Rome has never stopped worshiping Alexander even during the
period of its Christian fanaticism when it compelled people to go
through the Spanish Inquisition.
Did
the reader understand why right from the start we said that one can
clearly see Alexander’s tomb with his mind’s eyes? Rome laughs at the
expense of the archaeologist Liana Soulvatzi or anyone kindred who
searches in the muds to find the very thing Rome would never allow to be
hidden in the muds. Rome laughs at the expense of archaeologists who
search in dirt and debris in
order to discover what functions as the Holy Grail for the empire. In
the best case scenario, they will find rocks and wood of an abandoned
cenotaph because Rome itself has snatched its divine content long ago.
All it takes is for someone to realize the significance of the tomb to
Rome and he will figure out where it is located. It has been estimated
with mathematical accuracy that Alexander’s tomb rests at the heart of
Rome. It is also certain that all would-be world dominators care for the
tomb with the due respect; in the way it was cared for by former
emperors. We take it for granted that the all-powerful leaders of the
world, who visit the Vatican, are introduced to the secrets of Rome once
they take over their positions in power. We are convinced that people
like Carlomagno, Henry IIX, Napoleon and more contemporary figures like
Churchill, Roosevelt, Clinton, even that semi-stupid Bush have paid
their respects to Alexander’s tomb. Even Gorbatsov travelled to Rome to
announce the collapse of the Soviet Union in 1991. Why do it from Rome?
Could it be because he wanted to render homage to Rome and pay his
respects to its Father?
It
should not be surprising, even technically-wise, if the tomb is in the
Vatican City. We are aware of the standard Christian practice to efface
traces, so we can easily speculate on the possibility. It is a standard
Christian practice to bury Greek symbols in Christian graves. You efface
traces by creating new traces over the old ones. You step on footprints
so that it is not clear who has stepped on them first. They followed
the same practice as when they built Christian churches on the ground
where famous ancient-Greek temples had been formerly built. There has
been a church built in the name of the Virgin Mary even on the
Parthenon. That was the Christian way not only to rob Greeks of their
places of worship but also to control them so that they would never be
used for that purpose again.
We
believe that the same successful practice was followed in the case of
Alexander’s tomb. They have used another tomb to hide his tomb. They
have used the most famous tomb of Christianity to cover the most famous
tomb of humanity. Alexander’s tomb rests inside Saint Peter’s Crypt
because, among other reasons, the Pontiffs and Roman emperors wished to
be buried close to their Father and retain their after-death privilege
of immortality. The best among the blue-blooded Romans wish to be buried
next to the superior blue-blooded man. The people who wore the purple
robes wished to be buried next to the man who was born to the purple.
The mortal emperors wished to be buried next to the Immortal Emperor.
Notwithstanding, we
do not know if Alexander’s tomb rests in front of, behind or next to
the alleged Peter’s tomb. Most likely there is no Peter’s tomb, namely
most likely it has never been found. There are more chances that the
dead body of the insignificant Peter has never been found – after he had
been crucified – than the dead body of the God-Man Alexander has been
lost. Things are simple. There are more chances that one of the most
useful tools of Rome has never existed than the most precious of its
treasures, namely Alexander’s dead body, has been lost.
I
suggest that the next Greek sight-seer who visits the Vatican and
enters Saint Peter’s crypt takes a pause and stands before it a little
longer. I suggest that he closes his eyes and who knows; he might see
things more clearly. He might as well close his eyes and touch the crypt
with this mind. I suggest that he closes his eyes and he becomes the
raft by which Odysseus will escape the secret and secluded place of
Ogygia. Only the Greeks can bring back the storm-tossed Odysseus who
has won all wars but has not managed to return home because the witch of
Ogygia has fallen in love with him; the Roman witch in our case.
PANAGIOTIS TRAIANOU
Creator of the Aquarium theory
